Flores v. Reno Free Essay Example, 2500 words

The reason was that INS felt the juvenile would not have any reason to turn back up for deportation hearings, so they would be lost inside the system once again. Initially, the courts agreed with Flores, After the government won a series of appeals, however, the Supreme Court did eventually weigh in. In a 7-2 decision, the finding was against Flores and in favor of existing INS policy. While the various courts and Supreme Court Justices certainly wrestled with and sympathized with unaccompanied minor being detained, they did not feel that their rights were being unduly violated. They were to be remanded into INS custody, as deemed appropriate, until proper arrangements could be made for the care and/or return of the immigrants to their own country. The issue remains, of course, whether INS custody in a detention facility is the right place for a scared juvenile from another land. Subsequent to these rulings, the INS has reviewed and modified policies, insisting that they will no longer subject juveniles to facilities with opposite sex members and an adult population, in exchange for finding them custodians that can more properly care for th em. We will write a custom essay sample on Flores v. Reno or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now Many critics remain, however, as they have cited cases in at least four different states where the detainment on unaccompanied minors continues to be detrimental to the immigrants emotional and physical well being. Analysis Recent findings certainly seem to indicate that there is still a serious problem with the unaccompanied minor policies enacted in America when dealing with illegal immigrants. Even with new policies being implemented by INS, it is found that fewer than 1 percent of unaccompanied minors are actually granted any type of relief during their time in custody (Hernandez, 2011). Of children under the 18 who are detained without any type of custodial figure present, the law is still a bit muddied with ambiguity. It has been said that, â€Å"Once apprehended and charged with violating U. S. immigration laws, children enter a disjointed, labyrinthine system in which they may interact with numerous agencies within several federal government departments, as well as with a host of government contractors† (Ortega-Lison, 2007). During the time that they are detained, it is now quite likely that such minors will move around frequently, losing contact with any semblance of relationships that they may have gained while in the country, and come into contact with numerous individuals trying to look out for their own well-being.